Journal Article:
Summary:
Daniel DeMarco Journal Article Assignment Ambulatory Care
Acute Sinusitis in Adults
The New England Journal of Medicine
Rosenfeld, RM
Definition:
· Sinusitis:
· Symptomatic inflammation of paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity
· AKA rhinosinusitis 2/2 involvement of both paranasal sinuses and nasal mucosa
Epidemiology:
· 30 million adults annually in US
Etiology:
· MCC: Viral upper respiratory tract infections (pathogens)
· Most common bacterial pathogens: S pneumoniae, H influenzae, M catarrhalis, S aureus
· Increased association in patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, smoking, second-hand smoke exposure
Classification:
· Duration:
· Acute: Up to 4w
· Subacute: 4w-3m
· Chronic: >3m
· Presumed Cause:
· Acute Viral Sinusitis versus Acute Bacterial Sinusitis: Up to 90% with viral URTI have concurrent acute viral sinusitis; only 0.5 to 2.0% have sinusitis that progresses to bacterial sinusitis
– Viral Upper Respiratory Sx: peak rapidly, decline by day 3, ends after 1w
– Acute Bacterial Sinusitis: > or = to 10d or longer without improvement or worsening of sx after initial improvement
Disease Progression:
· Approx. 85% of patients have reduction/resolution of sx w/in 7-15d w/o antibiotic therapy. Though abx are rx in 84-91% of cases likely 2/2 to patient expectations and inconsistency between clinical guidelines and abx rx patterns
Clinical S/Sx:
· Purulent anterior/posterior nasal drainage (most accurate diagnostic criterion) +/- nasal obstruction
· Facial pain/pressure/fullness
· If periorbital edema, pain/restriction of EOMs, severe h/a think about complications
Diagnostic Imaging:
· XR/CT is not useful in distinguishing b/w bacterial and viral infection
· Reserved for patients with suspected complications (eg orbital/intracranial involvement)
Management Considerations:
· Most literature shows no effect on median duration of pain or illness in patients treated with abx versus placebo (no abx)
· Some literature shows small, but statistically significant, higher rates of clinical improvement in abx therapy. One systematic review reported success rates of 77-88% with abx therapy versus 73-85% in no abx
· Another systematic review with stricter inclusion criteria (illness > or = to 7d) reported no significant benefit in abx therapy over placebo (rate of improvement after 10d 88% versus 85%, respectively)
· Systematic review reports similar incidence of complications like cellulitis, meningitis, and orbital or intracranial abscess b/w abx and no abx
· No difference in comparative efficacy of abx reported in the literature; likely b/c high rate of spontaneous improvement (w/ or w/o abx)
· Systematic review reported no statistically significant difference in clinical success in abx regimens for 3-7d versus 6-10d; odds of ADRs were 21% lower in those with shorter course of treatment
· NNT for 1 patient to experience clinical improvement with abx ranges from 7-18.
· NNH (# patients who receive abx for one ADR to occur) ranges from 8-12
· The NNT and NNH indicate that ADRs from abx are as likely, or more likely than, benefits
· Consideration of ADRs to abx: allergic reactions, drug-resistant bacteria
· Adjuvant Therapies: topical intranasal corticosteroids conferred small but significant decrease in symptoms (pain, nasal congestion); oral glucocorticoids with slightly higher rates of improvement (though methodologic limitations and fact that systemic CS have associated risks, this is not recommended); conflicting reports on efficacy of nasal irrigation; literature on efficacy of decongestants, antihistamines and guaifenesin are lacking
· Special Populations:
· Pregnant Women: medical mimic – differentiate from nasal vascular engorgement (rhinitis of pregnancy)
· DM or Immunocompromised: more likely to harbor resistant bacteria; if high temperature, nasal crusting, severe facial pain must consider invasive fungal sinusitis (medical emergency)
· Refractory illness/Recurrent Bacterial Sinusitis (3+ in 6m)/Suspicion of developing orbital/intracranial complication: referral to ENT
Abx Recommendations:
· Guidelines differ! American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) state watchful waiting is similar to abx therapy. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommend all patients receive abx as initial treatment.
· Definitions of treatment failure differ! AAO-HNS states failure occurs if no reduction in sx by 7d. Other guidelines state failure occurs if no reduction in sx by 2-5d.
· If pregnant and abx indicated: amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate; if PCN-allergic then clindamycin + cefixime or cefpodoxime
· If DM and/or immunocompromised then amoxicillin-clavulanate, if no sx improvement w/in 72h then nasal culture with c/s.
· If treatment failure: Augmentin 2000-125 bid x10d, Doxycycline 200mg x10d
· Do not use clarithromycin or azithromycin 2/2 macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae
· Reserve fluoroquinolones for those with no alternative treatment options
Authors’ Recommendations:
· Initial management based on shared decision making
· If watchful waiting, consider delayed antibiotics: use if illness worsens, sx do not decrease w/in 7d
· If abx are initial therapy: Amoxicillin 1000mg tid x 5d
· If comorbidities (DM, immunosuppression): Augmentin 500-125 tid x 5-10d or 875-125 bid x 5-10d
· If PCN-allergic: Doxycycline 200mg (daily) x 5d
· For sx (facial pain, pressure, fullness): analgesics, nasal glucocorticoids, nasal decongestant (oxymetazoline) x 5d only (risk of rebound congestion); consider nasal rinse; antihistamines only if known allergies; No oral corticosteroids